To receive an update on the Integrated Disability Service Development Plan.
Minutes:
Background:
Issues Raised by the Committee: |
Responses Received: |
More information around early help teams, sharing of resources and training was requested.
|
Early help consisted of two aspects: generic early help children’s services and an early help team within the IDS service. The early help workers as part of the IDS team, benefitted from easy access to specialist knowledge around disabilities. Efforts were made to align intervention thresholds and share resources. Sometimes family challenges were unrelated to the child’s disability and support was tailored to the identified need, including specific programs like the Incredible Years, which had a version focused on ASD. This program was offered to children and families in both generic early help and disability services, recognising that not every child with autism required disability services. The two teams worked fluidly, with ongoing conversations to determine the best way to meet each child’s needs. |
Could families challenge the process if a care package was denied?
|
Yes, the service undertook regular reviews of care plans with families, conducted under the care and support process. The voices of parents and children were extremely important and were included in all assessments. If there were challenges, an escalation process was in place, allowing concerns to be addressed by the team manager and higher levels if necessary. Advocacy was a key focus, ensuring that the voices of children, parents, and carers were heard. The service actively supported referrals and helped families understand the role of an advocate, regardless of their satisfaction with the service. |
Point 3.2 of the report mentioned the pressure from the budget for direct payments. Had that gone in as a growth bid and if it so, which part of the growth bid had it gone in?
|
There was no growth in the integrated disability service budget. The Senior Manager for Care and Support was tasked with making savings for the current year’s financial position, particularly around short break provision. The savings target was met without causing challenges or escalations with families, emphasising co-production with children and families to determine the best support. Therefore, future plans for the 2025-26 budget included the more imaginative use of Powys residential homes to maximise the space and opportunities for children. |
Would the 2025-26 budget include ongoing cost efficiencies for this service? |
No, from the review undertaken this year, there would not be any cost efficiencies going forward for next year. |
Did the service reach out to satellite provision such as Cross Gates? |
Confirmation was given that the service was linked with satellite schools which were overseen by the same head teachers. A weekly triage was held with Powys Teaching Health Board colleagues to discuss upcoming needs. |
What processes were in place to audit the use of direct payments and what flexibility did families have in spending resources? |
This was a challenge. A recent SWAP audit had highlighted gaps within processes, which were being plugged and a follow up internal audit would be taking place soon. The IDS funding panel undertook regular six-monthly reviews of care packages. Further to this, care and support meetings were held regularly, where practitioners were advised to clearly assess whether the identified needs remained the same and were being met. |
Was rurality a limiting factor in families in receipt of direct payments receiving services?
|
Assurance was given that there were no children with an identified need which had not been met. But it was acknowledged that there could be a gap between a package of care being supported and the identification of a personal assistant. Teaching Assistants could often fill the gap. Especially over holiday periods. If a need was not met by the process and no solution was found, it would be reconsidered for other creative options. |
Were teaching assistants given the opportunity to upskill and move into the disability service? |
Assurance was given that there was collaborative working between education and disability services. Staff had been supported to work and move across the two services. |
It was requested that the Head of Children’s Services raised awareness of the opportunity for teaching assistants to transfer into the disability service. ACTION |
|
Supporting documents: