Venue: By Teams. View directions
Contact: Carol Johnson 01597 826206
No. | Item | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resolution to exclude the public and the press The Monitoring Officer has determined that categories 1 & 2 of the Access to Information Procedure Rules applies to the following items. His view on the public interest test (having taken account of the provisions of Rule 14.18 of the Council's Access to Information Rules) was that to make this information public would disclose information relating to:
(i) information relating to any individual
(ii) information which is likely to reveal the identity of an individual.
These factors in his view outweigh the public interest in disclosing this information. Members are asked to consider these factors when determining the public interest test, which they must decide when considering excluding the public from this part of the meeting.
Minutes: RESOLVED that in accordance with Section 100(a)(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 the public and press were excluded from the meeting on the grounds that there would be disclosure to them of exempt information under Paragraphs 12 and 18 of Schedule 12a Part 7 of the above Act in respect of the following item[s].
|
|||||
Review of a joint hackney carriage and private hire driver's licence |
|||||
Sub-Committee procedures PDF 59 KB To receive introductions from the Chair and an explanation of the Sub-Committee’s procedures from the Clerk to the Sub-Committee [Principal Solicitor]. Minutes: The Chair introduced the Sub-Committee and its Clerk.
The Clerk to the Sub-Committee explained the procedures to be followed by the Sub-Committee.
|
|||||
Review of a licence - JD/02/03 To consider a review of a Joint Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Drivers’ Licence. Additional documents:
Minutes: Applicant – JD/02/03 Mr R Hanratty, Solicitor for Applicant Applicant’s employer Mr R Bowen, Licensing Officer, Dyfed-Powys Police
Prior to consideration of the review Mr Hanratty made the following representations on behalf of his client: · he and his client had not had sufficient time to consider the issues raised, · he objected to the hearing being held remotely, with him, his client and his client’s employer being the only ones in a room together, · transcripts of interviews by the Police were not available and no transcript of the interview with the Police Licensing Officer and Powys Licensing Officer were available. Mr Hanratty asked that the Sub-committee be adjourned in light of the above.
The Police Licensing Officer advised that transcripts of the two interviews by the Police could be made available on request. He advised that the interview conducted by himself and the Powys Licensing Officer was not recorded but he confirmed he could provide a summary of what happened and he could ask the Powys Licensing Officer to do the same.
The Sub-committee considered the requests.
The Chair thanked all for attending.
|